Traditional RAG has a dirty secret: it treats your knowledge base like a bag of disconnected facts.
Ask a standard RAG system “Who reports to Sarah?” and it might retrieve Sarah’s bio, a random org chart snippet, and an unrelated meeting note — then hallucinate an answer from this chaos.
GraphRAG changes everything. By combining knowledge graphs with retrieval-augmented generation, it achieves what traditional RAG can’t: actual reasoning across connected information.
And in 2026, this is becoming the new standard for enterprise AI.
Contents
The Problem With Traditional RAG
Retrieval-Augmented Generation was a breakthrough. Instead of relying solely on an LLM’s training data, RAG retrieves relevant documents and includes them in the prompt. This reduces hallucinations and keeps responses grounded in your actual data.
But traditional RAG has fundamental limitations:
1. Chunk Isolation
RAG splits documents into chunks and retrieves based on semantic similarity. Each chunk is treated independently — the system doesn’t understand how chunks relate to each other.
If the answer requires combining information from three different documents, traditional RAG often fails.
2. No Relationship Awareness
Consider a question like: “What projects is the London office working on that involve clients in the healthcare sector?”
This requires understanding:
- Which employees belong to the London office
- Which projects those employees work on
- Which clients are associated with those projects
- Which clients are in healthcare
Traditional RAG retrieves text that mentions “London,” “healthcare,” and “projects” — but can’t trace the actual relationships.
3. Context Window Waste
To compensate for poor retrieval, traditional RAG often stuffs the context window with marginally relevant chunks. This wastes tokens, increases costs, and can actually confuse the model with noise.
4. No Explainability
When traditional RAG answers a question, you can’t easily trace why it retrieved specific chunks or how it combined them. This makes debugging and auditing nearly impossible.
How GraphRAG Works
GraphRAG adds a knowledge graph layer between your documents and your LLM. Here’s the architecture:
Step 1: Knowledge Extraction
Documents are processed to extract entities and relationships:
- Entities: People, companies, products, locations, concepts
- Relationships: “works at,” “manages,” “located in,” “part of”
- Properties: Dates, amounts, statuses, categories
This creates a structured graph where nodes are entities and edges are relationships.
Step 2: Graph + Vector Hybrid Retrieval
When a query arrives, GraphRAG uses both:
- Vector similarity — finding semantically relevant entities
- Graph traversal — following relationships to connected entities
For “What projects involve London healthcare clients?” the system:
- Finds the “London Office” entity
- Traverses “employs” edges to find employees
- Traverses “works on” edges to find projects
- Traverses “for client” edges to find clients
- Filters clients by “sector = healthcare”
Step 3: Subgraph Context
Instead of random chunks, the LLM receives a relevant subgraph — the specific entities and relationships needed to answer the question.
This context is:
- Precise — only relevant information included
- Connected — relationships are explicit
- Traceable — you can see exactly what was retrieved and why
Step 4: Grounded Generation
The LLM generates an answer grounded in the subgraph, with full visibility into the reasoning path.
The Numbers: GraphRAG vs Traditional RAG
Research and production deployments show significant improvements:
- 91% accuracy on complex multi-hop queries (vs ~60% for traditional RAG)
- 73% reduction in hallucinations for relationship-based questions
- 40% fewer tokens needed per query (more precise retrieval)
- Full traceability — every answer maps to specific graph paths
The gap widens dramatically as query complexity increases. Simple fact lookups show modest improvement. Multi-step reasoning questions show transformational improvement.
When GraphRAG Makes Sense
GraphRAG isn’t always necessary. Use it when:
Your Data Has Rich Relationships
- Organisational structures (who reports to whom)
- Customer relationships (accounts, contacts, interactions)
- Product hierarchies (components, dependencies, compatibility)
- Process flows (steps, handoffs, dependencies)
- Regulatory mappings (requirements, controls, evidence)
Questions Require Multi-Hop Reasoning
If answering questions requires connecting information across multiple documents or entities, GraphRAG dramatically outperforms.
Explainability Matters
For compliance, auditing, or high-stakes decisions, the ability to trace exactly how an answer was derived is essential.
You Have Accuracy Requirements
If 70% accuracy isn’t good enough — if wrong answers have real consequences — GraphRAG’s improvement matters.
Implementation Architecture
A production GraphRAG system typically includes:
Knowledge Graph Database
Options include Neo4j (most mature), Amazon Neptune, or newer options like PuppyGraph. The database stores entities, relationships, and properties with efficient traversal capabilities.
Entity Extraction Pipeline
LLMs (often smaller, specialized models) extract entities and relationships from source documents. This runs during ingestion, not query time.
Hybrid Retrieval Engine
Combines vector search (for semantic matching) with graph queries (for relationship traversal). LangChain and LlamaIndex both support this pattern.
Query Decomposition
Complex questions get broken into sub-queries that map to graph operations. “Projects involving London healthcare clients” becomes a structured traversal query.
Response Generation
The LLM receives the subgraph context and generates natural language answers with optional citations to specific graph paths.
The Build vs Buy Decision
GraphRAG can be implemented using open source tools or enterprise platforms:
Open Source Path
- Microsoft’s GraphRAG (open sourced in 2024)
- Neo4j + LangChain integration
- LlamaIndex knowledge graph modules
Pros: Full control, no licensing costs, customisation flexibility.
Cons: Requires significant engineering investment, ongoing maintenance burden.
Enterprise Platforms
- Databricks with Unity Catalog + GraphRAG
- Azure AI with Cosmos DB graph capabilities
- Purpose-built solutions like Fluree, Squirro
Pros: Faster deployment, managed infrastructure, enterprise support.
Cons: Licensing costs, less customisation, vendor dependency.
Getting Started: A Practical Path
If you’re considering GraphRAG, here’s a proven approach:
Phase 1: Identify Use Case (Week 1)
- Find a question set that traditional RAG answers poorly
- Confirm questions require relationship reasoning
- Scope the document corpus
Phase 2: Build Knowledge Graph (Weeks 2-3)
- Define entity types and relationships for your domain
- Run extraction on your corpus
- Validate and clean the graph
Phase 3: Implement Retrieval (Week 4)
- Build hybrid retrieval pipeline
- Test against your question set
- Measure accuracy improvement
Phase 4: Production Hardening (Weeks 5-6)
- Add monitoring and logging
- Implement incremental updates
- Deploy with proper error handling
The Future: Knowledge Graphs as AI Infrastructure
Looking ahead to 2026-2030, knowledge graphs are becoming foundational AI infrastructure — not just a RAG enhancement.
Trends emerging:
- Continuous learning — graphs that update automatically from new documents
- Multi-modal graphs — incorporating images, tables, and structured data
- Federated graphs — connecting knowledge across organisational boundaries
- Agent memory — AI agents using graphs as persistent memory and world models
Organisations building knowledge graph capabilities now will have significant advantages as these patterns mature.
The Bottom Line
Traditional RAG works for simple question-answering over document collections. But as enterprises demand more from AI — multi-step reasoning, relationship understanding, traceable answers — its limitations become blockers.
GraphRAG isn’t just an incremental improvement. It’s a different paradigm that unlocks use cases traditional RAG simply can’t address.
The question isn’t whether knowledge graphs will become standard in enterprise AI. It’s whether you’ll build the capability now or scramble to catch up later.
Exploring GraphRAG for your enterprise knowledge systems? Let’s discuss architecture options.